Rule "SV agreement, subjects containing clauses - sing."

This is one of many errors that LanguageTool can detect. Visit the LanguageTool homepage to use it online or download it for free.

Description:	SV agreement, subjects containing clauses - sing.
	By default, this rule is not active in LanguageTool
Message:	Possible agreement error detected: the verb form '\22' does not seem to match the subject.
Category:	Grammar (ID: GRAMMAR)
Incorrect sentences that this rule can detect:	The code that throws the error for this part seem to actually test for both UrlReadingCondition as well as Condition, but the error message is always the same. Correction suggestion: seems, seemed Any reason that calling this built-in method for the class always give debug messages? Correction suggestion: gives, gave The drunk driver who ran the light across the street fatally injure the pedestrian in the crosswalk. Correction suggestion: injures, injured The tall woman that I met yesterday at the market manage the department. Correction suggestion: manages, managed The tall woman that I actually met yesterday at the market manage the department. Correction suggestion: manages, managed The tall woman that I didn't meet yesterday at the market manage the department. Correction suggestion: manages, managed The magician who performed magic tricks at my previous birthdays ask my mom out on a date. Correction suggestion: asks, asked
Correct sentences for comparison:	The reason that I created two alert conditions is because NRQL based alert conditions don't accept multiple attributes. The fact that AUI exposes some prefixed class names that have special behaviour makes me wonder about what's going on under the hood… but I haven't looked close enough.
Pattern:	Show XML · Show in Rule Editor
Check the following text against just this rule:
ID:	SV_AGREEMENT_CLAUSES_SINGULAR [4]
Version:	6.5-SNAPSHOT (2024-05-20 22:33:07 +0200)