<< return to list of rules

Rule "Agreement: 'been' or 'was' + past tense"

This is one of many errors that LanguageTool can detect.

Description:	Agreement: 'been' or 'was' + past tense
Message:	Did you mean <suggestion>\1 having</suggestion> or <suggestion>'ve</suggestion>?
Category:	Grammar (ID: GRAMMAR)
Link:	https://languagetool.org/insights/post/verb-tenses/
Incorrect sentences that this rule can detect:	They're have a good time. Correction suggestion: 're having, 've
Correct sentences for comparison:	Tom's had a very good year. Only Eton, Shrewsbury and St Edward's have won more events at the Regatta. When death approaches, all you can do is slowly chew your fingernails. Probably the wisest thing to do is ask a whole lot of questions. The only thing Tom and Mary ever do is complain. All you've done with your worthless life is disappoint ever yone. So now all I wanna do is just spend as much time with you as possible. The only other sporting event that began before cricket was horse racing, which started in 1796. All are bate stamped That was bollocks. these should probably be book to book transactions They were nose to nose. Therefore, my question to you, is do we drop the independent amount language from the original confirmation and provide alternative language referencing the new specific guaranty. What fuel there was went to panzer divisions I guess I just recognize that all that big brain has ever done is get you into trouble. So now all I'm going to do is just spend as much time with you as possible. What this system does, is allow a user to post to a topic, or a range of topics, in one group What you could do is create a virtual contact sensor with switch capabilities. So if there is anything we can do about it is try to attract some new contributors who might at some point want to become constant maintainers. Ok, the only one solution as I see is allow admins see the content and admins may be trusted persons.
ID:	BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT [1]
Version:	6.6-SNAPSHOT (2024-11-24 22:33:09 +0100)