<< return to list of rules

Rule "Missing noun after an adjective"

This is one of many errors that LanguageTool can detect. Visit the LanguageTool homepage to use it online or download it for free.

Description:	Missing noun after an adjective
Message:	A noun may be missing here.
Category:	Grammar (ID: GRAMMAR)
Tags:	[picky]
Incorrect sentences that this rule can detect:	This is an absurd.
Correct sentences for comparison:	This is an absurd opinion. Harry hit an impressive 80% Have a nice WE It is a no-go. Michael Moulton has done a swap with a Korean entity that will be confirmed under a confirmation with Annex A attached. Their compensation will most likely be equal or better and they will be working for a going concern that is A rated. The exterior derivative of a 1-form is therefore a 2-form, and that of a 2-form is a 3-form. There have been three editions, and the publisher wants her to do a 4th. Regards, Hollis Val Artman Hi Hollis, this request came to me as a FAR. He's a metrosexual. The least initial deviation from the truth is multiplied later a thousandfold. He teaches the Qur'an online. The point where they meet is called a convergent.
Pattern:	Show XML · Show in Rule Editor
Check the following text against just this rule:
ID:	DT_JJ_NO_NOUN [1]
Version:	6.5-SNAPSHOT (2024-04-28 22:33:06 +0200)