LanguageTool Community

<< return to list of rules

Rule "missing 'be' before 'able'"

This is one of many errors that LanguageTool can detect. Visit the LanguageTool homepage to use it online or download it for free.

Description: missing 'be' before 'able'
Message: Did you mean \3 be?
Category: Grammar (ID: GRAMMAR)
Incorrect sentences
that this rule can detect:
  • Can't we able to do achieve this?
    Correction suggestion: we be
Pattern: Show XML · Show in Rule Editor
Check the following text against just this rule:

ID: PRP_ABLE_TO [2]
Version: 6.4-SNAPSHOT (2024-03-27 22:33:08 +0100)