LanguageTool Community
Imprint · Privacy Policy
<< return to list of rules

Rule "missing 'be' before 'able'"

This is one of many errors that LanguageTool can detect. Visit the LanguageTool homepage to use it online or download it for free.

Description: missing 'be' before 'able'
Message: Did you mean \2 been?
Category: Grammar (ID: GRAMMAR)
Incorrect sentences
that this rule can detect:
  • Have we ever able to do achieve this?
    Correction suggestion: we been
  • Have you able to solve this?
    Correction suggestion: you been
  • Has anyone able to solve this issue?
    Correction suggestion: anyone been
Correct sentences
for comparison:
  • ..., and then have it able to issue subdomains.
Pattern: Show XML · Show in Rule Editor
Check the following text against just this rule:

ID: PRP_ABLE_TO [3]
Version: 6.5-SNAPSHOT (2024-04-26 22:33:08 +0200)